OCA-OAS
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2023 | |||||||||||||
( as of Decemberr 31, 2023 ) | |||||||||||||
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | |||||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | ||||||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 458 | 49% | 462 | 51% | 920 | 295 | 1215 | ||||||
FAMILY COURT | 31 | 30% | 71 | 70% | 102 | 81 | 183 | ||||||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 49 | 38% | 77 | 61% | 126 | 43 | 169 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 66 | 33% | 132 | 67% | 198 | 63 | 261 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 113 | 38% | 183 | 62% | 296 | 74 | 370 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 165 | 47% | 186 | 53% | 351 | 114 | 465 | ||||||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||||||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 13 | 81% | 3 | 19% | 16 | 35 | 51 | ||||||
T O T A L | 896 | 45% | 1114 | 55% | 2010 | 709 | 2719 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2023 | |||||||||||||
( as of December 31, 2023) | |||||||||||||
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTAL INCUMBENT PERSONNEL |
TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES |
TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL |
|||||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | ||||||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 5026 | 38% | 8263 | 62% | 13289 | 4466 | 17755 | ||||||
FAMILY COURT | 341 | 37% | 577 | 63% | 918 | 1788 | 2706 | ||||||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 732 | 44% | 926 | 56% | 1658 | 661 | 2319 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1130 | 40% | 1699 | 60% | 2829 | 896 | 3725 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 896 | 37% | 1542 | 63% | 2438 | 573 | 3011 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1088 | 38% | 1759 | 62% | 2847 | 883 | 3730 | ||||||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 18 | 50% | 18 | 50% | 36 | 19 | 55 | ||||||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 114 | 54% | 97 | 46% | 211 | 197 | 408 | ||||||
T O T A L | 9345 | 39% | 14881 | 61% | 24226 | 9483 | 33709 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2022 | |||||||||||||
( as of Decemberr 31, 2022 ) | |||||||||||||
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | |||||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | ||||||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 476 | 51% | 462 | 49% | 938 | 277 | 1215 | ||||||
FAMILY COURT | 29 | 29% | 70 | 71% | 99 | 84 | 183 | ||||||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 50 | 37% | 87 | 63% | 137 | 32 | 169 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 65 | 23% | 215 | 77% | 280 | -19 | 261 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 118 | 41% | 171 | 59% | 289 | 81 | 370 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 167 | 47% | 187 | 53% | 354 | 111 | 465 | ||||||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||||||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 14 | 82% | 3 | 18% | 17 | 34 | 51 | ||||||
T O T A L | 920 | 43% | 1195 | 57% | 2115 | 604 | 2719 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2022 | |||||||||||||
( as of December 31, 2022 ) | |||||||||||||
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTAL INCUMBENT PERSONNEL | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | ||||||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4959 | 38% | 8110 | 62% | 13069 | 4686 | 17755 | ||||||
FAMILY COURT | 295 | 39% | 471 | 61% | 766 | 1940 | 2706 | ||||||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 717 | 44% | 925 | 56% | 1642 | 677 | 2319 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1144 | 40% | 1697 | 60% | 2841 | 884 | 3725 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 880 | 37% | 1496 | 63% | 2376 | 635 | 3011 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1074 | 38% | 1728 | 62% | 2802 | 928 | 3730 | ||||||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 19 | 51% | 18 | 49% | 37 | 18 | 55 | ||||||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 111 | 56% | 87 | 44% | 198 | 210 | 408 | ||||||
T O T A L | 9199 | 39% | 14532 | 61% | 23731 | 9978 | 33709 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2021
(as of December 31, 2021)
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTALINCUMBENTJUDGES | TOTALNUMBER OFVACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OFJUDGES | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 458 | 51% | 441 | 49% | 899 | 311 | 1210 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 24 | 31% | 53 | 69% | 77 | 21 | 98 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 42 | 37% | 71 | 63% | 113 | 56 | 169 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 69 | 35% | 126 | 65% | 195 | 66 | 261 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 111 | 40% | 169 | 60% | 280 | 89 | 369 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 175 | 48% | 191 | 52% | 366 | 101 | 467 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 15 | 83% | 3 | 17% | 18 | 33 | 51 | |||
T O T A L | 895 | 46% | 1054 | 54% | 1949 | 681 | 2630 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2021
(as of December 31, 2021)
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTALINCUMBENTJUDGES | TOTALNUMBER OFVACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OFJUDGES | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4865 | 38% | 7818 | 62% | 12683 | 4993 | 17676 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 230 | 40% | 340 | 60% | 570 | 861 | 1431 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 691 | 43% | 906 | 57% | 1597 | 722 | 2319 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1124 | 40% | 1682 | 60% | 2806 | 907 | 3713 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 859 | 37% | 1464 | 63% | 2323 | 679 | 3002 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1063 | 39% | 1683 | 61% | 2746 | 1000 | 3746 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 19 | 49% | 20 | 51% | 39 | 16 | 55 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 115 | 60% | 79 | 40% | 194 | 214 | 408 | |||
T O T A L | 938 | 47% | 1068 | 53% | 2006 | 624 | 2630 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2020
(as of December 31, 2020)
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTALINCUMBENTJUDGES | TOTALNUMBER OFVACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OFJUDGES | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 483 | 52% | 442 | 48% | 925 | 285 | 1210 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 23 | 33% | 47 | 67% | 70 | 28 | 98 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 44 | 38% | 73 | 62% | 117 | 52 | 169 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 74 | 36% | 130 | 64% | 204 | 57 | 261 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 111 | 39% | 174 | 61% | 285 | 84 | 369 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 185 | 48% | 199 | 52% | 384 | 83 | 467 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 17 | 85% | 3 | 15% | 20 | 31 | 51 | |||
T O T A L | 938 | 47% | 1068 | 53% | 2006 | 624 | 2630 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2020
(as of December 31, 2020)
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTALINCUMBENTPERSONNEL | TOTALNUMBER OFVACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OFPERSONNEL | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4753 | 38% | 7623 | 62% | 12376 | 5300 | 17676 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 189 | 42% | 261 | 58% | 450 | 981 | 1431 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 687 | 44% | 887 | 56% | 1574 | 745 | 2319 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1116 | 40% | 1678 | 60% | 2794 | 919 | 3713 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 876 | 37% | 1474 | 63% | 2350 | 652 | 3002 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1061 | 39% | 1648 | 61% | 2709 | 1037 | 3746 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 19 | 48% | 21 | 52% | 40 | 15 | 55 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 118 | 61% | 77 | 40% | 195 | 213 | 408 | |||
T O T A L | 8819 | 39% | 13669 | 61% | 22488 | 9862 | 32350 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2019
(as of December 31, 2019)
C O U R T | GENDER | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 469 | 56% | 395 | 44% | 864 | 346 | 1210 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 13 | 27% | 35 | 73% | 48 | 50 | 98 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 48 | 39% | 75 | 61% | 123 | 46 | 169 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 81 | 41% | 128 | 59% | 209 | 52 | 261 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 116 | 45% | 157 | 55% | 273 | 96 | 369 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 173 | 52% | 178 | 48% | 351 | 116 | 467 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 23 | 86% | 3 | 14% | 26 | 25 | 51 | |||
T O T A L | 924 | 51% | 971 | 49% | 1895 | 735 | 2630 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2019
(as of December 31, 2019)
C O U R T | G E N D E R | TOTAL INCUMBENT PERSONNEL | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4634 | 38% | 7435 | 62% | 12069 | 5607 | 17676 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 189 | 49% | 257 | 51% | 446 | 985 | 1431 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 687 | 44% | 869 | 56% | 1556 | 763 | 2319 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1126 | 40% | 1700 | 60% | 2826 | 887 | 3713 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 873 | 36% | 1494 | 64% | 2367 | 635 | 3002 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1081 | 38% | 1680 | 62% | 2761 | 985 | 3746 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 20 | 50% | 22 | 50% | 42 | 13 | 55 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 122 | 60% | 79 | 40% | 201 | 207 | 408 | |||
T O T A L | 8732 | 39% | 13536 | 61% | 22268 | 10082 | 32350 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2018
(as of December 31, 2018)
COURT | GENDER | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 467 | 56% | 363 | 44% | 830 | 339 | 1169 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 13 | 27% | 35 | 73% | 48 | 0 | 48 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 44 | 39% | 70 | 61% | 114 | 50 | 164 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 86 | 41% | 125 | 59% | 211 | 46 | 257 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 117 | 45% | 143 | 55% | 260 | 107 | 367 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 180 | 52% | 165 | 48% | 345 | 122 | 467 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 19 | 86% | 3 | 14% | 22 | 29 | 51 | |||
T O T A L | 927 | 51% | 904 | 49% | 1831 | 697 | 2528 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2018
(as of December 31, 2018)
COURT | GENDER | TOTAL INCUMBENT PERSONNEL | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4632 | 38% | 7450 | 62% | 12082 | 5044 | 17126 | |||
FAMILY COURT | 77 | 49% | 80 | 51% | 157 | 524 | 681 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 598 | 44% | 775 | 56% | 1373 | 880 | 2253 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1135 | 40% | 1696 | 60% | 2831 | 823 | 3654 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 856 | 36% | 1518 | 64% | 2374 | 612 | 2986 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1089 | 38% | 1749 | 62% | 2838 | 908 | 3746 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 22 | 50% | 22 | 50% | 44 | 11 | 55 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 126 | 60% | 83 | 40% | 209 | 199 | 408 | |||
T O T A L | 8535 | 39% | 13373 | 61% | 21908 | 9001 | 30909 |
TOTAL NUMBER OF MALE & FEMALE JUDGES
(First and Second Level Courts)
As of 31 DECEMBER 2018
REGION | NO. OF MALE & FEMALE JUDGES | |||||||||||||||
RTC MALE | RTC FEMALE | RTC Male Percentage | RTC Female Percentage | MALE FC | FEMALE FC | FC Male Percentage | FC Female Percentage | MeTC MALE | MeTC FEMALE | MeTC Male Percentage | MeTC Female Percentage | MTCC MALE | MTCC FEMALE | MTCC Male Percentage | MTCC Female Percentage | |
NCRJ | 103 | 128 | 45% | 55% | 5 | 11 | 31% | 69% | 51 | 78 | 40% | 60% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION 1 | 33 | 24 | 58% | 42% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 4 | 10 | 29% | 71% |
REGION II | 31 | 5 | 86% | 14% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 5 | 4 | 56% | 44% |
REGION III | 37 | 42 | 47% | 53% | 2 | 11 | 15% | 85% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 10 | 13 | 43% | 57% |
REGION IV | 39 | 34 | 53% | 47% | 6 | 13 | 32% | 68% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 10 | 19 | 34% | 66% |
REGION V | 30 | 12 | 71% | 29% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 3 | 7 | 30% | 70% |
REGION VI | 28 | 25 | 53% | 47% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 14 | 14 | 50% | 50% |
REGION VII | 49 | 24 | 67% | 33% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 9 | 23 | 28% | 72% |
REGION VIII | 23 | 10 | 70% | 30% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 6 | 2 | 75% | 25% |
REGION IX | 21 | 12 | 64% | 36% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 7 | 1 | 88% | 13% |
REGION X | 22 | 16 | 58% | 42% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 7 | 16 | 30% | 70% |
REGION XI | 27 | 25 | 52% | 48% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 4 | 9 | 31% | 69% |
REGION XII | 11 | 8 | 58% | 42% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 4 | 5 | 44% | 56% |
454 | 365 | 55% | 45% | 13 | 35 | 27% | 73% | 51 | 78 | 40% | 60% | 83 | 123 | 40% | 60% |
REGION | NO. OF MALE & FEMALE JUDGES | |||||||||||||||
MTC MALE | MTC FEMALE | MTC Male Percentage | MTC Female Percentage | MCTC MALE | MCTC FEMALE | MCTC Male Percentage | MCTC Female Percentage | SDC MALE | SDC FEMALE | SDC Male Percentage | SDC FeMale Percentage | SCC MALE | SCC FEMALE | SCC Male Percentage | SCC Female Percentage | |
NCRJ | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION 1 | 17 | 19 | 47% | 53% | 20 | 21 | 49% | 51% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION II | 7 | 14 | 33% | 67% | 20 | 17 | 54% | 46% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION III | 21 | 20 | 51% | 49% | 8 | 13 | 38% | 62% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION IV | 25 | 30 | 45% | 55% | 9 | 23 | 28% | 72% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION V | 17 | 14 | 55% | 45% | 13 | 9 | 59% | 41% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION VI | 3 | 10 | 23% | 77% | 21 | 12 | 64% | 36% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION VII | 5 | 3 | 63% | 38% | 16 | 12 | 57% | 43% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION VIII | 8 | 15 | 35% | 65% | 23 | 16 | 59% | 41% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION IX | 1 | 5 | 17% | 83% | 6 | 8 | 43% | 57% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 5 | 2 | 71% | 29% |
REGION X | 4 | 3 | 57% | 43% | 17 | 13 | 57% | 43% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION XI | 5 | 7 | 42% | 58% | 10 | 12 | 45% | 55% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION XII | 2 | 3 | 40% | 60% | 15 | 5 | 75% | 25% | 1 | – | 100% | 0% | 15 | 1 | 94% | 6% |
115 | 143 | 45% | 55% | 178 | 161 | 53% | 47% | 1 | 0 | 100% | 0% | 20 | 3 | 87% | 13% |
MALE | FEMALE | Male | Female Percentage | |
RTC | 454 | 365 | 55% | 45% |
FC | 13 | 35 | 27% | 73% |
MeTC | 51 | 78 | 40% | 60% |
MTCC | 83 | 123 | 40% | 60% |
MTC | 115 | 143 | 45% | 55% |
MCTC | 178 | 161 | 53% | 47% |
SDC | 1 | – | 100% | 0% |
SCC | 20 | 3 | 87% | 13% |
915 | 908 | 50% | 50% | |
TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | 1,823 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2017
(as of December 31, 2017)
COURT | GENDER | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 487 | 58% | 360 | 42% | 847 | 322 | 1169 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 42 | 41% | 60 | 59% | 102 | 62 | 164 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 90 | 41% | 128 | 59% | 218 | 39 | 257 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 129 | 47% | 145 | 53% | 274 | 93 | 367 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 191 | 54% | 166 | 46% | 357 | 110 | 467 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 25 | 89% | 3 | 11% | 28 | 23 | 51 | |||
T O T A L | 965 | 53% | 862 | 47% | 1827 | 653 | 2480 |
NUMBER OF MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL IN THE LOWER COURTS FOR 2017
(as of December 31, 2017)
COURT | GENDER | TOTAL INCUMBENT PERSONNEL | TOTAL NUMBER OF VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | ||||||
MALE | % | FEMALE | % | |||||||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4449 | 38% | 7236 | 62% | 11685 | 5441 | 17126 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 573 | 44% | 734 | 56% | 1307 | 946 | 2253 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1077 | 39% | 1672 | 61% | 2749 | 905 | 3654 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 841 | 36% | 1515 | 64% | 2356 | 630 | 2986 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1101 | 38% | 1786 | 62% | 2887 | 859 | 3746 | |||
SHARIÁ DISTRICT COURT | 21 | 52% | 22 | 48% | 43 | 12 | 55 | |||
SHARIÁ CIRCUIT COURT | 131 | 62% | 82 | 38% | 213 | 195 | 408 | |||
T O T A L | 8193 | 39% | 13047 | 61% | 21240 | 8988 | 30228 |
TOTAL NUMBER OF MALE & FEMALE JUDGES
(First and Second Level Courts)
As of 31 DECEMBER 2017
REGION | NO. OF MALE & FEMALE JUDGES | |||||||||||||||
RTC MALE | RTC FEMALE | RTC Male Percentage | RTC Female Percentage | MALE FC | FEMALE FC | FC Male Percentage | FC Female Percentage | MeTC MALE | MeTC FEMALE | MeTC Male Percentage | MeTC Female Percentage | MTCC MALE | MTCC FEMALE | MTCC Male Percentage | MTCC Female Percentage | |
NCRJ | 114 | 134 | 46% | 54% | 5 | 11 | 31% | 69% | 41 | 58 | 41% | 59% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION 1 | 27 | 20 | 57% | 43% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 4 | 10 | 29% | 71% |
REGION II | 29 | 5 | 85% | 15% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 5 | 4 | 56% | 44% |
REGION III | 41 | 44 | 48% | 52% | 2 | 11 | 15% | 85% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 10 | 13 | 43% | 57% |
REGION IV | 45 | 34 | 57% | 43% | 6 | 13 | 32% | 68% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 10 | 19 | 34% | 66% |
REGION V | 31 | 13 | 70% | 30% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 3 | 7 | 30% | 70% |
REGION VI | 30 | 26 | 54% | 46% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 15 | 14 | 52% | 48% |
REGION VII | 51 | 27 | 65% | 35% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 10 | 23 | 30% | 70% |
REGION VIII | 23 | 14 | 62% | 38% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 6 | 2 | 75% | 25% |
REGION IX | 21 | 12 | 64% | 36% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 7 | 1 | 88% | 13% |
REGION X | 23 | 17 | 58% | 43% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 8 | 16 | 33% | 67% |
REGION XI | 28 | 29 | 49% | 51% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 4 | 9 | 31% | 69% |
REGION XII | 14 | 8 | 64% | 36% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 4 | 5 | 44% | 56% |
477 | 383 | 55% | 45% | 13 | 35 | 27% | 73% | 41 | 58 | 41% | 59% | 86 | 123 | 41% | 59% |
REGION | NO. OF MALE & FEMALE JUDGES | |||||||||||||||
MTC MALE | MTC FEMALE | MTC Male Percentage | MTC Female Percentage | MCTC MALE | MCTC FEMALE | MCTC Male Percentage | MCTC Female Percentage | SDC MALE | SDC FEMALE | SDC Male Percentage | SDC FeMale Percentage | SCC MALE | SCC FEMALE | MTC Male Percentage | SCC Female Percentage | |
NCRJ | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION 1 | 19 | 20 | 49% | 51% | 20 | 21 | 49% | 51% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION II | 7 | 14 | 33% | 67% | 20 | 17 | 54% | 46% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION III | 23 | 20 | 53% | 47% | 8 | 13 | 38% | 62% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION IV | 28 | 31 | 47% | 53% | 10 | 23 | 30% | 70% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION V | 18 | 14 | 56% | 44% | 13 | 9 | 59% | 41% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION VI | 3 | 10 | 23% | 77% | 22 | 12 | 65% | 35% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION VII | 5 | 3 | 63% | 38% | 17 | 12 | 59% | 41% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION VIII | 8 | 15 | 35% | 65% | 23 | 16 | 59% | 41% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION IX | 1 | 5 | 17% | 83% | 7 | 8 | 47% | 53% | – | – | 0% | 0% | 5 | 2 | 71% | 29% |
REGION X | 5 | 3 | 63% | 38% | 18 | 13 | 58% | 42% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION XI | 5 | 7 | 42% | 58% | 10 | 12 | 45% | 55% | – | – | 0% | 0% | – | – | 0% | 0% |
REGION XII | 2 | 3 | 40% | 60% | 15 | 5 | 75% | 25% | 1 | – | 100% | 0% | 18 | 1 | 95% | 5% |
124 | 145 | 46% | 54% | 183 | 161 | 53% | 47% | 1 | 0 | 100% | 0% | 23 | 3 | 88% | 12% |
MALE | FEMALE | Male | Female Percentage | |
RTC | 477 | 134 | 78% | 22% |
FC | 13 | 35 | 27% | 73% |
MeTC | 41 | 58 | 41% | 59% |
MTCC | 86 | 123 | 41% | 59% |
MTC | 124 | 145 | 46% | 54% |
MCTC | 183 | 161 | 53% | 47% |
SDC | 1 | – | 100% | 0% |
SCC | 23 | 3 | 88% | 12% |
948 | 659 | 59% | 41% | |
TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | 1,607 |
SEX – DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(as of Decemberr 31, 2016)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTALNUMBER OFVACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF JUDGES | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 479 | 59% | 339 | 41% | 818 | 351 | 1169 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 46 | 43% | 61 | 57% | 107 | 57 | 164 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 91 | 45% | 112 | 55% | 203 | 54 | 257 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 141 | 52% | 132 | 48% | 273 | 94 | 367 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 189 | 54% | 159 | 46% | 348 | 119 | 467 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 25 | 89% | 3 | 11% | 28 | 23 | 51 | |||
TOTAL | 972 | 55% | 806 | 45% | 1778 | 702 | 2480 |
SEX – DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(as of December 31, 2016)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT PERSONNEL | TOTALNUMBER OFVACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4429 | 38% | 7194 | 62% | 11623 | 5503 | 17126 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 549 | 43% | 732 | 57% | 1281 | 972 | 2253 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES | 1113 | 40% | 1688 | 60% | 2801 | 853 | 3654 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 849 | 35% | 1553 | 65% | 2402 | 584 | 2986 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1143 | 38% | 1860 | 62% | 3003 | 743 | 3746 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 23 | 52% | 21 | 48% | 44 | 11 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 134 | 62% | 83 | 38% | 217 | 191 | 408 | |||
TOTAL | 8240 | 39% | 13131 | 61% | 21371 | 8857 | 30228 |
DATA ON ADMINISTRATIVE CASES FOR FEMALE AND MALE JUDGES FOR THE YEAR 2016
SECOND LEVEL COURT JUDGES
FEMALE JUDGES | MALE JUDGES | TOTAL | |
Cases Filed | 60 | 107 | 167 |
Complaint Dismissed | 59 | 83 | 142 |
Admonished | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Benefits Forfeited | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Censured | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dismissed From Service | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Fined | 3 | 13 | 16 |
Reprimanded | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Suspended | 2 | 1 | 3 |
FIRST LEVEL COURT JUDGES
FEMALE JUDGES | MALE JUDGES | TOTAL | |
Cases Filed | 23 | 39 | 62 |
Complaint Dismissed | 25 | 43 | 68 |
Admonished | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Benefits Forfeited | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Censured | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dismissed From Service | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Fined | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Reprimanded | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Suspended | 0 | 1 | 1 |
DATA ON ADMINISTRATIVE CASES FOR FEMALE and MALE JUSTICES FOR THE YEAR 2016
COURT OF APPEALS
FEMALE JUSTICES | MALE JUSTICES | TOTAL | |
Cases Filed | 14 | 19 | 33 |
Complaint Dismissed | 6 | 3 | 9 |
SANDIGANBAYAN
FEMALE JUSTICES | MALE JUSTICES | TOTAL | |
Cases Filed | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Complaint Dismissed | 0 | 2 | 2 |
COURT OF TAX APPEALS
NONE
DATA ON ADMINISTRATIVE CASES FOR FEMALE AND MALE SHARI’A JUDGES FOR THE YEAR 2016
SHARI’A DISTRICT COURT
NONE
SHARI’A CIRCUIT COURT
FEMALE JUSTICES | MALE JUSTICES | TOTAL | |
Cases Filed | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Complaint Dismissed | 0 | 1 | 1 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2015)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF COURTS | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 498 | 60% | 320 | 39% | 818 | 351 | 1169 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 42 | 46% | 49 | 54% | 91 | 73 | 164 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 96 | 48% | 105 | 52% | 201 | 56 | 257 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 145 | 52% | 131 | 47% | 276 | 91 | 367 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 193 | 56% | 153 | 44% | 346 | 121 | 467 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 25 | 89% | 3 | 11% | 28 | 23 | 51 | |||
TOTAL | 1000 | 57% | 761 | 43% | 1761 | 719 | 2280 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2015)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4522 | 38% | 7353 | 62% | 11867 | 5259 | 17126 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 533 | 42% | 729 | 58% | 1251 | 1002 | 2253 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 1244 | 44% | 1793 | 64% | 2804 | 850 | 3654 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 897 | 36% | 1619 | 64% | 2518 | 468 | 2986 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1173 | 38% | 1912 | 62% | 3077 | 669 | 3746 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 26 | 55% | 21 | 45% | 47 | 8 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 137 | 63% | 81 | 37% | 219 | 189 | 408 | |||
TOTAL | 8532 | 39% | 13508 | 62% | 21783 | 8445 | 30228 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2014)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF COURTS | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 501 | 63% | 298 | 37% | 799 | 370 | 1169 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 38 | 44% | 48 | 56% | 86 | 78 | 164 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 91 | 49% | 96 | 51% | 187 | 70 | 257 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 146 | 54% | 122 | 46% | 268 | 99 | 367 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 196 | 59% | 138 | 41% | 334 | 133 | 467 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 25 | 89% | 3 | 11% | 28 | 23 | 51 | |||
TOTAL | 997 | 59% | 705 | 41% | 1702 | 778 | 2480 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2014)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4544 | 38% | 7352 | 62% | 11896 | 5230 | 17126 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 497 | 41% | 706 | 69% | 1203 | 1066 | 2269 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 1100 | 40% | 1629 | 60% | 2729 | 925 | 3654 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 898 | 36% | 1625 | 64% | 2523 | 463 | 2986 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1192 | 38% | 1942 | 62% | 3134 | 612 | 3746 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 27 | 55% | 22 | 45% | 49 | 6 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 141 | 64% | 79 | 36% | 220 | 188 | 408 | |||
TOTAL | 8399 | 39% | 13355 | 61% | 21754 | 8490 | 30244 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2013)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF COURTS | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 541 | 65.00% | 293 | 35.00% | 834 | 170 | 1004 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 35 | 47.00% | 40 | 53.00% | 75 | 35 | 110 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 96 | 51.00% | 92 | 49.00% | 188 | 39 | 227 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 143 | 55.00% | 118 | 45.00% | 261 | 114 | 375 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 194 | 60.00% | 131 | 40.00% | 325 | 143 | 468 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 26 | 90.00% | 3 | 10.00% | 29 | 22 | 51 | |||
TOTAL | 1035 | 60.00% | 677 | 40.00% | 1712 | 528 | 2240 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2013)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4663 | 39.00% | 7397 | 61.00% | 12060 | 2615 | 14675 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 482 | 41.00% | 678 | 59.00% | 1160 | 372 | 1532 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 1082 | 40.00% | 1596 | 60.00% | 2678 | 532 | 3210 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 931 | 36.00% | 1687 | 64.00% | 2618 | 441 | 3059 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1211 | 38.00% | 2001 | 62.00% | 3212 | 541 | 3753 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 26 | 52.00% | 24 | 48.00% | 50 | 5 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 147 | 65.00% | 80 | 35.00% | 227 | 181 | 408 | |||
TOTAL | 5842 | 39.00% | 13463 | 61.00% | 22005 | 4687 | 26692 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2012)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF COURTS | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 538 | 66.00% | 269 | 34.00% | 807 | 161 | 968 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 31 | 44.00% | 40 | 56.00% | 71 | 35 | 106 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 97 | 55.00% | 78 | 45.00% | 175 | 54 | 229 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 146 | 56.00% | 112 | 44.00% | 258 | 120 | 378 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 184 | 64.00% | 104 | 36.00% | 288 | 179 | 467 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 25 | 90.00% | 3 | 10.00% | 28 | 24 | 52 | |||
TOTAL | 1021 | 63.00% | 606 | 37.00% | 1627 | 578 | 2205 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2012)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4687 | 39.00% | 7405 | 61.00% | 12092 | 2014 | 14106 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 446 | 41.00% | 631 | 59.00% | 1077 | 405 | 1482 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 1072 | 40.00% | 1577 | 60.00% | 2649 | 579 | 3228 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 951 | 36.00% | 1718 | 64.00% | 2669 | 413 | 3082 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1237 | 38.00% | 2050 | 62.00% | 3287 | 474 | 3761 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 25 | 50.00% | 25 | 50.00% | 50 | 5 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 149 | 65.00% | 81 | 35.00% | 230 | 178 | 408 | |||
TOTAL | 8567 | 39.00% | 13847 | 61.00% | 22054 | 4068 | 26122 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2011)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF COURTS | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 529 | 67.00% | 262 | 33.00% | 791 | 177 | 968 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 37 | 53.00% | 33 | 47.00% | 70 | 36 | 106 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 104 | 58.00% | 74 | 42.00% | 178 | 51 | 229 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 150 | 56.00% | 119 | 42.00% | 269 | 105 | 374 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 196 | 64.00% | 106 | 34.00% | 300 | 166 | 466 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 26 | 90.00% | 3 | 10.00% | 29 | 22 | 51 | |||
TOTAL | 1040 | 64.00% | 597 | 36.00% | 1637 | 562 | 2199 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2011)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4729 | 36.00% | 8563 | 64.00% | 13292 | 1868 | 15160 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 448 | 42.00% | 631 | 58.00% | 1079 | 441 | 1520 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 1111 | 41.00% | 1568 | 59.00% | 2679 | 549 | 3228 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 973 | 36.00% | 1721 | 64.00% | 2694 | 358 | 3052 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1248 | 37.00% | 2125 | 63.00% | 3373 | 365 | 3738 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 25 | 50.00% | 25 | 50.00% | 50 | 5 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 146 | 64.00% | 83 | 36.00% | 229 | 179 | 408 | |||
TOTAL | 8680 | 37.00% | 14716 | 63.00% | 23396 | 3765 | 27161 |
GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF JUSTICE SECTOR PERSONNEL
POSITION GROUP | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |||||||
Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | ||
Metropolitan Trial Courts | ||||||||||
Judges | 32 | 37 | 69 | 356 | 34 | 69 | 37 | 37 | 74 | |
Court Personnel | 419 | 588 | 1007 | 434 | 558 | 992 | 431 | 547 | 978 | |
Sub-Total | 451 | 625 | 1076 | 790 | 592 | 1061 | 468 | 584 | 1052 | |
Municipal Trial Courts in Cities MTCC | ||||||||||
Judges | 125 | 67 | 192 | 112 | 61 | 173 | 104 | 67 | 171 | |
Court Personnel | 1087 | 1334 | 2421 | 1137 | 1408 | 2545 | 1147 | 1424 | 2571 | |
Sub-Total | 1212 | 1401 | 1613 | 1249 | 1469 | 2718 | 1251 | 1491 | 2472 | |
Municipal Trial Courts MTC | ||||||||||
Judges | 178 | 110 | 288 | 187 | 115 | 302 | 172 | 166 | 288 | |
Court Personnel | 1096 | 1885 | 2981 | 1349 | 1594 | 2943 | 1272 | 1554 | 2826 | |
Sub-Total | 1274 | 1995 | 3269 | 1536 | 1709 | 3245 | 1444 | 1670 | 3114 | |
Municipal Circuit Trial Courts MCTC | ||||||||||
Judges | 209 | 103 | 312 | 214 | 108 | 322 | 205 | 113 | 318 | |
Court Personnel | 1225 | 2193 | 3418 | 1223 | 2176 | 3399 | 1225 | 2186 | 3411 | |
Sub-Total | 1434 | 2296 | 3730 | 1473 | 2284 | 3721 | 1430 | 2299 | 3729 | |
Sharia Circuit Courts SCC | ||||||||||
Judges | 30 | 3 | 33 | 29 | 2 | 31 | 30 | 2 | 32 | |
Court Personnel | 149 | 94 | 243 | 149 | 94 | 243 | 146 | 97 | 243 | |
Sub-Total | 179 | 97 | 276 | 178 | 96 | 274 | 176 | 99 | 275 | |
Regional Trial Courts RTC | ||||||||||
Judges | 542 | 228 | 770 | 527 | 223 | 780 | 572 | 247 | 819 | |
Court Personnel | 4529 | 6903 | 11432 | 4526 | 6893 | 11419 | 4529 | 6893 | 11422 | |
Sub-Total | 5071 | 7131 | 12202 | 5053 | 7116 | 12199 | 5101 | 7140 | 12241 | |
Sharia District Courts SDC | ||||||||||
Judges | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Court Personnel | 21 | 22 | 43 | 19 | 24 | 43 | 19 | 24 | 43 | |
Sub-Total | 21 | 22 | 43 | 19 | 24 | 43 | 19 | 24 | 43 | |
Grand Total | 9642 | 13567 | 23209 | 10262 | 13290 | 23261 | 9889 | 13307 | 23196 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2007)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF COURTS | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 572 | 71% | 234 | 29% | 806 | 148 | 954 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 36 | 51% | 35 | 49% | 71 | 24 | 95 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 119 | 67% | 59 | 33% | 178 | 34 | 212 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 173 | 60% | 116 | 40% | 289 | 98 | 387 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 228 | 70% | 100 | 30% | 328 | 142 | 470 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 33 | 97% | 1 | 3% | 34 | 4 | 38 | |||
TOTAL | 1161 | 68% | 646 | 32% | 1706 | 466 | 2161 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2007)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4602 | 39.66% | 7003 | 60.34% | 11605 | 1896 | 13501 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 416 | 41.64% | 583 | 58.36% | 999 | 170 | 1169 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 1117 | 44.41% | 1398 | 55.59% | 2515 | 428 | 2843 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 1080 | 37% | 1853 | 63% | 2943 | 251 | 3194 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1200 | 36% | 2163 | 64% | 3363 | 473 | 3836 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 20 | 45.46% | 24 | 54.54% | 44 | 11 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 134 | 64.42% | 74 | 35.58% | 208 | 95 | 303 | |||
TOTAL | 8669 | 39.66% | 13108 | 60.44% | 21677 | 3324 | 26001 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE JUDGES OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2006)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF COURTS | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 566 | 71.65% | 224 | 28.36% | 790 | 164 | 954 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 34 | 52.31% | 31 | 47.69% | 65 | 30 | 95 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 110 | 70.00% | 48 | 30.00% | 158 | 54 | 212 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 160 | 63% | 94 | 37% | 254 | 133 | 387 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 168 | 70.60% | 70 | 29.40% | 238 | 232 | 470 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 27 | 90.43% | 1 | 3.57% | 28 | 10 | 38 | |||
TOTAL | 1066 | 69.60% | 468 | 30.60% | 1633 | 628 | 2161 |
SEX-DISAGGREGATED DATA ON MALE AND FEMALE PERSONNEL OF FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS
(As of December 31, 2006)
C O U R T | MALE | % | FEMALE | % | TOTAL INCUMBENT JUDGES | TOTAL NUMBER VACANCIES | TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL | |||
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT | 4602 | 39.55% | 7034 | 60.45% | 11636 | 1865 | 13501 | |||
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT | 431 | 42.13% | 592 | 57.87% | 1023 | 146 | 1169 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT-IN-CITIES | 1002 | 42.84% | 1337 | 57.16% | 2339 | 604 | 2943 | |||
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT | 1096 | 37% | 1853 | 63% | 2949 | 245 | 3194 | |||
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT | 1312 | 27.97% | 3379 | 72.03% | 4691 | 855 | 3836 | |||
SHARIA DISTRICT COURT | 21 | 47.73% | 23 | 52.27% | 44 | 11 | 55 | |||
SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT | 152 | 66.09% | 78 | 33.91% | 230 | 73 | 303 | |||
TOTAL | 8616 | 37.60% | 14296 | 62.40% | 22512 | 2799 | 26001 |
Email Us
Please include your name, contact number, email address, and the subject in your email.
Please read our Privacy Notice for the terms on the collection of your personal information.
By using this Query Form, you agree to the collection of personal data. For more information, you may refer to our Privacy Notice.